FAT Brands (NASDAQ: FAT) is one of 58 public companies in the “Eating places” industry, but how does it compare to its competitors? We will compare FAT Brands to similar businesses based on the strength of its profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.
This table compares FAT Brands and its competitors’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
|Net Margins||Return on Equity||Return on Assets|
|FAT Brands Competitors||-2.85%||-67.53%||0.31%|
This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for FAT Brands and its competitors, as provided by MarketBeat.
|Sell Ratings||Hold Ratings||Buy Ratings||Strong Buy Ratings||Rating Score|
|FAT Brands Competitors||1163||4354||4503||208||2.37|
As a group, “Eating places” companies have a potential upside of 4.76%. Given FAT Brands’ competitors stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FAT Brands has less favorable growth aspects than its competitors.
Insider & Institutional Ownership
1.3% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of shares of all “Eating places” companies are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of shares of all “Eating places” companies are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares FAT Brands and its competitors revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
|Gross Revenue||Net Income||Price/Earnings Ratio|
|FAT Brands||$22.50 million||-$1.02 million||-37.89|
|FAT Brands Competitors||$1.98 billion||$195.62 million||15.85|
FAT Brands’ competitors have higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. FAT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than its competitors, indicating that it is currently more affordable than other companies in its industry.
Volatility and Risk
FAT Brands has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FAT Brands’ competitors have a beta of 1.25, meaning that their average stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.
FAT Brands competitors beat FAT Brands on 11 of the 13 factors compared.
About FAT Brands
FAT Brands Inc., a multi-brand franchising company, acquires, markets, and develops fast casual and casual dining restaurant concepts. As of April 22, 2019, it owned 7 restaurant brands, including Fatburger, Buffalo's Cafe, Buffalo's Express, Hurricane Grill & Wings, Yalla Mediterranean, Ponderosa Steakhouse, and Bonanza Steakhouse with approximately 300 locations open and 200 under development worldwide. The company was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Beverly Hills, California. FAT Brands Inc. is a subsidiary of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.
Receive News & Ratings for FAT Brands Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for FAT Brands and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.